Description
Written by and for legal academics, lawyers, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists, The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court, documenting the history, complexities, and repercussions of the Court's opinions. Among the topics in the present volume: abortion, toleration, and moral uncertainty; and doctrinal synergies and liberal dilemmas the case of the yellow-dog contract. Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.
Read More
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
Read Less