The major threat to the United States presently does not come from the possibility of war with another large power, suggests David (political science, Johns Hopkins U.), but rather from the consequences of state collapse and civil war in a variety of regions of the world. In this work, he highlights four states as warranting special concern as potential incubators of civil wars or other forms of instability that could damage US interests: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, and Mexico. He assesses the possibilities for each and discusses what the US can do in response to such contingencies. Annotation ©2009 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Read More
Civil war and other types of radical domestic upheaval are replacing international war as the preeminent threat to American security and economic well being, according to Steven R. David. Catastrophic Consequences argues that civil conflicts are of even greater importance than deliberate efforts to harm the United States because the damage they inflict is unintended and therefore impossible to deter.David examines the prospects for and potential aftereffects of instability in four nations vital to U.S. national interests—Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, and Mexico. It is not, he argues, a rising China that threatens America, but one that is falling apart. Likewise, it is not a hostile Pakistani regime over which the United States should worry, rather it is one that cannot keep the country together. Similarly, a conflict-torn Mexico or Saudi Arabia poses a far greater danger to America than does either of those states growing stronger. In assessing these threats, David contends that the United States’s only viable option is to view other-state civil upheaval similarly to natural disasters and to develop a coherent, effective emergency response mechanism, which does not exist today in any systemic, nationwide form.
Read Less